Search Term:

Sunday, October 14, 2012

El Pe on de Guatape - Colombia


El Pe on de Guatape - Colombia


A massive stone rising over 650 feet out of the flat ground of Guatape, Colombia, the Piedra de Penol or El Pe on de Guatape was once worshiped by the Tahamies Indians. By the 1900s, the massive 10-million-ton rock was seen by local farmers as a nuisance, a giant version of the rocks that the farmers regularly dug out of their fields.


In 1954 a group of friends supposedly at the urging of a local priest climbed the rock using a series of boards wedged into a crack. These were the first people known to have climbed El Pe on de Guatape. (It is unknown whether the Tahamies had a way of ascending the stone.) Climbing the huge stone took five days, but the top of the rock revealed both beautiful views and a new species of plant, Pitcairma heterophila. The rock soon became a modest tourist attraction.


The rock, which is almost entirely smooth, has one long crack, the one that the climbers used in ascending it. In the crack was later wedged a 649-step masonry staircase, the only way to get to the top of the Piedra de Penol. In the 1970s, the area was dammed, and the view from the rock changed: It now overlooks a dramatic series of lakes and islands.


Today, you can ascend the rock (apparently owned by a local family, though also designated by Colombia as a "national monument") for 2 US dollars. There you\'ll find a few religious relics and a three-story lookout tower.











Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Persepolis...Part...1


Persepolis (Old Persian 𐎱𐎠𐎼𐎿 Pārsa, Takht-e Jamshid or Chehel Minar) was the ceremonial capital of the Achaemenid Empire (ca. 550-330 BCE). Persepolis is situated 70 km northeast of the modern city of Shiraz in the Fars Province of modern Iran. In contemporary Persian, the site is known as Takht-e Jamshid (Throne of Jamshid). The earliest remains of Persepolis date from around 515 BCE. To the ancient Persians, the city was known as Pārsa, which means "The City of Persians". Persepolis is a transliteration of the Greek Πέρσης πόλις (Persēs polis: "Persian city").
UNESCO declared the citadel of Persepolis a World Heritage Site in 1979.


Construction

Archaeological evidence shows that the earliest remains of Persepolis date from around 515 BC. André Godard, the French archaeologist who excavated Persepolis in the early 1930s, believed that it was Cyrus the Great (Kūrosh) who chose the site of Persepolis, but that it was Darius the Great (Daryush) who built the terrace and the great palaces.
Darius ordered the construction of the Apadana Palace and the Council Hall (the Tripylon or three-gated hall), the main imperial Treasury and its surroundings. These were completed during the reign of his son, King Xerxes the Great (Khashayar). Further construction of the buildings on the terrace continued until the downfall of the Achaemenid dynasty.[2]

Monday, May 14, 2012

Naqsh-e Rustam...Ancient city of Iran


Naqsh-e Rustam (Persian: نقش رستم‎ Naqš-e Rostam) also referred to as Necropolis is an archaeological site located about 12 km northwest of Persepolis, in Fars province, Iran. Naqsh-e Rustam lies a few hundred meters from Naqsh-e Rajab.
The oldest relief at Naqsh-i Rustam is severely damaged and dates to c. 1000 BC. It depicts a faint image of a man with unusual head-gear and is thought to be Elamite in origin. The depiction is part of a larger mural, most of which was removed at the command of Bahram II. The man with the unusual cap gives the site its name, Naqsh-e Rostam, "Picture of Rostam", because the relief was locally believed to be a depiction of the mythical hero Rostam.
Naqsh-e Rustam

Naqsh-e Rustam is located in Iran
Naqsh-e Rustam
Location in Iran
Coordinates: 29°59′20″N 52°52′29″E

Contents

  [show] 

[edit]Achaemenid tombs


Colorized photograph of Naqsh-e Rustam. Source:The National Geographic Magazine, April 1921.

Naqsh-i-Rustam 2008.
Four tombs belonging to Achaemenid kings are carved out of the rock face. They are all at a considerable height above the ground.
The tombs are known locally as the 'Persian crosses', after the shape of the facades of the tombs. The entrance to each tomb is at the center of each cross, which opens onto to a small chamber, where the king lay in a sarcophagus. The horizontal beam of each of the tomb's facades is believed to be a replica of the entrance of the palace at Persepolis.
One of the tombs is explicitly identified by an accompanying inscription to be the tomb of Darius I the Great (c. 522-486 BC). The other three tombs are believed to be those of Xerxes I (c.486-465 BC), Artaxerxes I (c. 465-424 BC), and Darius II (c. 423-404 BC) respectively. A fifth unfinished one might be that of Artaxerxes III, who reigned at the longest two years, but is more likely that of Darius III (c. 336-330 BC), last of the Achaemenid dynasts.
The tombs were looted following the conquest of the Achaemenid empire by Alexander the Great.

[edit]Sassanid reliefs


Ka'ba-ye Zartosht (cube shaped construction in the foreground) against the backdrop of Naqsh-e Rustam.

The investiture of Ardashir I.

The triumph of Shapur I over the Roman Emperor Valerian, and Philip the Arab.
Seven oversized rock reliefs at Naqsh-e Rustam depict monarchs of the Sassanid period.
  • The investiture relief of Ardashir I (c. 226-242):
The founder of the Sassanid Empire is seen being handed the ring of kingship by Ahura Mazda. In the inscription, which also bears the oldest attested use of the term 'Iran' (see "etymology of 'Iran'" for details), Ardashir admits to betraying his pledge to Artabanus IV (the Persians having been a vassal state of the Arsacid Parthians), but legitimizes his action on the grounds that Ahura Mazda had wanted him to do so.
  • The triumph of Shapur I (c. 241-272):
This is the most famous of the Sassanid rock reliefs, and depicts Shapur's victory over two Roman emperors, Valerian and Philip the Arab. A more elaborate version of this rock relief is at Bishapur.
  • The "grandee" relief of Bahram II (c. 276-293):
On each side of the king, who is depicted with an oversized sword, figures face the king. On the left stand five figures, perhaps members of the king's family (three having diadems, suggesting they were royalty). On the right stand three courtiers, one of which may be Kartir. This relief is to the immediate right of the investiture inscription of Ardashir (see above), and partially replaces the much older relief that gives Naqsh-e Rustam its name.
  • The two equestrian reliefs of Bahram II (c. 276-293):
The first equestrian relief, located immediately below the fourth tomb (perhaps that of Darius II), depicts the king battling a mounted Roman soldier.
The second equestrian relief, located immediately below the tomb of Darius I, is divided into two registers, an upper and a lower one. In the upper register, the king appears to be forcing a Roman enemy from his horse. In the lower register, the king is again battling a mounted Roman soldier.
Both reliefs depict a dead enemy under the hooves of the king's horse.
  • The investiture of Narseh (c. 293-303):
In this relief, the king is depicted as receiving the ring of kingship from a female figure that is frequently assumed to be the divinity Aredvi Sura Anahita. However, the king is not depicted in a pose that would be expected in the presence of a divinity, and it hence likely that the woman is a relative, perhaps Queen Shapurdokhtak.
  • The equestrian relief of Hormizd II (c. 303-309):
This relief is below tomb 3 (perhaps that of Artaxerxes I) and depicts Hormizd forcing an enemy (perhaps Papak of Armenia) from his horse. Immediately above the relief and below the tomb is a badly damaged relief of what appears to be Shapur II (c. 309-379) accompanied by courtiers.

[edit]Archaeology


In 1923, the German archaeologist Ernst Herzfeld made casts of the inscriptions on the tomb of Darius I. Since 1946, these casts are held in the archives of the Freer Gallery of Art and the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, in Washington, DC.
Naqsh-e Rustam was excavated for several seasons between 1936 and 1939 by a team from the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, led by Erich Schmidt.[1]

Naqsh-e Rustam

[edit]

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Great Zimbabwe


Great Zimbabwe is a ruined city that was once the capital of the Kingdom of Zimbabwe, which existed from approximately 1100 to 1400 during the country’s Late Iron Age. The monument, which first began to be constructed in the 11th century and which continued to be built until the 14th century, spanned an area of 722 hectares (1,784 acres) and at its peak could have housed up to 18,000 people. Great Zimbabwe acted as a royal palace for the Zimbabwean monarch and would have been used as the seat of their political power. One of its most prominent features were its walls, some of which were over five metres high and which were constructed without mortar. Eventually the city was largely abandoned and fell into ruin.

File:Great-Zimbabwe-2.jpg

The ruins were first encountered by Europeans in the late 19th century with investigation of the site starting in 1871.[1] The monument caused great controversy amongst the archaeological world, with political pressure being put upon archaeologists by the government of Rhodesia to deny its construction by black peoples. Great Zimbabwe has since been adopted as a national monument by the Zimbabwean government, with the modern state being named after it. The word "Great" distinguishes the site from the many hundreds of small ruins, known as Zimbabwes, spread across the Zimbabwe Highveld.[2] There are 200 such sites in southern Africa, such as Bumbusi in Zimbabwe and Manyikeni in Mozambique, with monumental, mortarless walls and Great Zimbabwe is the largest.[3]

10664449.jpg (1840×1232)
4288748.jpg (1024×768)Masvingo-Great-Zimbabwe-ruins-SMO.jpg (3543×2351)Great-Zimbabwe.jpg (2100×1414)

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Origins of United States


Origins of United States

You know the names of all 50 states…but do you know where any of them come from? Here’s the best information we could find on the origin of each. Read more after the break...

  • ALABAMA: Possibly from the Creek Indian word alibamo, meaning "we stay here."
  • ALASKA: From the Aleutian word alakshak, which means "great lands," or "land that is not an island."
  • ARIZONA: Taken either from the pima Indian words ali shonak, meaning "little spring," or from the Aztec word arizuma, meaning "silver-bearing."
  • ARKANSAS: The French somehow coined it from the name of the Siouan Quapaw tribe.
  • CALIFORNIA: According to one theory, Spanish settlers names it after a utopian society described in a popular 16th-century novel called Serged de Esplandian.
  • COLORADO: Means "red" in Spanish. The name was originally applied to the Colorado River, whose waters are reddish with canyon clay.
  • CONNECTICUT: Taken from the Mohican word kuenihtekot, which means "long river place."
  • DELAWARE: Named after Lord De La Warr, a governor of Virginia. Originally used only to name the Delaware River.
  • FLORIDA: Explorer Ponce de Leon named the state Pascua Florida - "flowery Easter"—on Easter Sunday in 1513.
  • GEORGIA: Named after King George II of England, who charted the colony in 1732.
  • HAWAII: An English adaptation of the native word owhyhee, which means "homeland."
    IDAHO: Possibly taken from the Kiowa Apache word for the Comanche Indians.
  • ILLINOIS: The French bastardization of the Algonquin word illini, which means "men."
  • INDIANA: Named by English-speaking settlers because the territory was full of Indians.
  • IOWA: The Sioux word for "beautiful land," or "one who puts to sleep."
  • KANSAS: Taken from the Sioux word for "south wind people," their name for anyone who lived south of Sioux territory.
  • KENTUCKY: Possibly derived from the Indian word kan-tuk-kee, meaning "dark and bloody ground." Or kan-tuc-kec, "land of green reeds", or ken-take, meaning "meadowland."
  • LOUISIANA: Named after French King Louis XIV.
    MAINE: The Old French word for "province."
  • MARYLAND: Named after Queen Henrietta Maria, wife of English King George I.
  • MASSACHUSETTS: Named after the Massachusetts Indian tribe. Means "large hill place."
  • MICHIGAN: Most likely from the Chippewa word for "great water." micigama.
  • MINNESOTA: From the Sioux word for "sky tinted" or "muddy water."
  • MISSISSIPPI: Most likely taken from the Chippewa words mici ("great") and zibi ("river").
  • MISSOURI: From the Algonquin word for "muddy water."
  • MONTANA: Taken from the Latin word for "mountainous."
  • NEBRASKA: From the Otos Indian word for "broad water."
  • NEVADA: Means "snow-clad" in Spanish.
  • NEW HAMPSHIRE: Capt. John Mason, one of the original colonists, named it after his English home county of Hampshire.
  • NEW JERSEY: Named after the English Isle of Jersey.
  • NEW MEXICO: The Spanish name for the territory north of the Rio Grande.
  • NEW YORK: Named after the Duke of York and Albany.
  • NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA: From the Latin name Carolus; named in honor of King Charles I of England.
  • NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA: Taken from the Sioux word for "friend," or "ally."
  • OHIO: Means "great," "fine," or "good river" in Iriquois.
  • OKLAHOMA. The Choctaw word for "red man."
  • OREGON: Possibly derived from Ouaricon-sint, the French name for the Wisconsin River.
  • PENNSYLVANIA: Named after William Penn, Sr., the father of the colony’s founder, William Penn. Means "Penn’s woods."
  • RHODE ISLAND: Named "Roode Eylandt" (Red Island) because of its red clay.
  • TENNESSEE: Named after the Cherokee tanasi villages along the banks of the Little Tennessee River.
  • TEXAS: Derived from the Caddo Indian word for "friend," or "ally."
  • UTAH: Means "upper," or "higher," and was originally the name that Navajos called the Shoshone tribe.
  • VERMONT: A combination of the French words vert ("green") and mont ("mountain").
  • VIRGINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA: Named after Queen Elizabeth I of England, the "virgin" queen, by Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584.
  • WASHINGTON: Named after George Washington.
  • WISCONSIN: Taken from the Chippewa word for "grassy place."
  • WYOMING: Derived from the Algonquin word for "large prairie place."

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Nevada Shoe Tree


Nevada Shoe Tree


Between the small towns of Fallon and Austin stands a tree on the side of the highway. Much like the gum tree in Ohio, it has become a living, breathing work of collective art - a piece which has an unwritten history and a fluid, unending future. It exists by the sheer will of its anonymous participants and the spirit of conspiracy. I present to you, in all its breathtaking majesty and glory, the Nevada shoe tree. 10 more images after the break...





People amaze and amuse me. It is a wonderment that never ceases. Often times it can be appalling, the brutal and insensitive nature of humanity, but for the most part, I've always found it inspiring. Man is capable of the grandest achievements - philosophically, artistically, and mechincally - and yet, simultaneously, can be reduced to tearful, hysterical laughter by a really good fart joke. It is this duality of the human spirit that moves me; the sacred and the profane, the high-brow and the low-brow, the earnest endeavor and the flight of fancy.There is a tree at the Kings Island amusement park in Ohio. I forget which ride it is, one of the big water rides. The line you have to stand in winds through a forest to the attraction. There are many trees along the path, but one in particular was singled out by the throngs of hot, idle park-goers for a piece of impromptu collective art. I've always called it the gum tree. There, on the right-side of the path stands the small tree, it's trunk almost completely covered in globs of chewing gum of every color imaginable. It's not like base graffiti, an essentially one person show of artistry on a public canvas. Sure, graffiti when un-checked results in a collection of various artists in a localized area, but it's not a collective effort on a singular undertaking. Someone, most likely a group of someones, standing in that line decided to all stick their gum on that tree. Consequentially, over the years, more and more people added more gum to the tree, resulting in the myriad of color that exists today.I discovered a similar phenomena in central Nevada. Trees are rare here in the desert climate. One is generally hard pressed to spot a tree on the stark landscape. U.S. Highway 50 runs laterally through the center of the state, from Ely on its eastern border all the way to Lake Tahoe. It is a beautful drive, with long stretches of open country. Often times you can drive anywhere from 50 to 100 miles between towns with nary a house in site. Between the small towns of Fallon and Austin stands a tree on the side of the highway. Much like the gum tree in Ohio, it has become a living, breathing work of collective art - a piece which has an unwritten history and a fluid, unending future. It exists by the sheer will of its anonymous participants and the spirit of conspiracy. I present to you, in all its breathtaking majesty and glory, the Nevada shoe tree.

While I'm sure no one went barefoot to create this masterpiece, it is arguable that it has required a bit of sacrifice to create and forethought to maintain. Whoever began this must've had some extra shoes and just tossed them into the tree branches. Over the years, people travelling through the area have made their donation to the tree with pairs of unwanted shoes that happened to be in their RV's and trucks.
It is an amazing sight up close. The tree is filled with every type and size shoe imaginable. Children's sneakers and adult's atheletic shoes. Boots of all stripes: workboots, hiking boots, cowboy boots, and even a pair of rubber knee-high "hipwaders". Pumps, sandals, wing-tips, and loafers.
Which is what makes this project so astounding on a level that the gum tree cannot begin to approach. This tree, literally and figuratively, represents every walk of American life. What probably began as a prank or a joke, and is probably still fueled largely by mischeivous adolescents, has blossmed into a beautiful statement which an indivudal artist could never capture. The very essence of the art lies in the fact that it was created in cohort and by collusion to create an unintentional statement.
It is certainly one of the most amazing things I have seen in my great American escapade thus far. For me it captures perfectly that dual nature of humanity, particularly the American human. Sometimes it is easy to feel inconsequential, like one's contribution to life and society is of little import. In a grander scheme of things, this may be true, but in the realm of the trivial interactions of humans, sometimes all it takes to be part of something beautiful and infamous is tossing a pair of shoes into a tree.

Share With Ur freinds....

Related Posts with Thumbnails